Academic and Social Integration by Level of Computer Use, Race, and Gender

dc.contributor.authorAlbright, Kristin Marieen
dc.contributor.committeechairHirt, Joan B.en
dc.contributor.committeememberSettle, Teden
dc.contributor.committeememberJanosik, Steven M.en
dc.contributor.departmentEducational Leadership and Policy Studiesen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:34:38Zen
dc.date.adate2007-06-27en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:34:38Zen
dc.date.issued2007-04-16en
dc.date.rdate2007-06-27en
dc.date.sdate2007-04-30en
dc.description.abstractExtensive research is available about both academic and social integration among college students (Braxton & Hirschy, 2004; Dennis, 1998; Kuh, Kinzie, Schuh, & Whitt, 2005; Tinto, 1975 & 1987). As college students spend time and become more involved in the campus community, academic and social integration increases (Astin, 1977; 1985; Kuh, Schuh, Whitt, Andreas, Lyons, Strange, Krehbiel, & MacKay, 1991), which leads to student retention. There are differences, however, in academic and social integration by race and gender. Research also suggests that college students are spending more time on computers (Bugeja, 2006; Fallows, 2005; Gemmill & Peterson, 2006; Hawkins & Paris, 1997; Jones, 2002; Jones, 2003; Messineo & DeOllos, 2005; Rainie, Kaleoff, & Hess, 2002; Reisberg, 2000) though women and minority students still lag behind their peers when using a computer (Fallow, 2005; Hawkins & Paris, 1997; Messineo & DeOllos, 2005). Currently, however, there is no literature that examines the effects that computer use and race and computer use and gender may have on academic and social integration. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between academic and social integration by computer use and race and computer use and gender. Data from the College Student Experience Questionnaire (CSEQ) (Pace & Kuh, 1998) were employed to explore these issues. A dataset of 2,000 respondents that included representative numbers of the entire sample of men and women as well as Caucasians and respondents of other races was used. The respondents were categorized as low or high computer users based on responses to a series of items on the CSEQ. Other CSEQ items were used to assess respondents' academic and social integration. Results indicate that differences for academic and social integration exist by level of computer use. Overall, high computer users are more academically and socially integrated than low computer users. The results also indicate that academic integration does not differ by level of computer user and race or level of computer use and gender.en
dc.description.degreeMaster of Artsen
dc.identifier.otheretd-04302007-231146en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04302007-231146/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/32054en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartALBRIGHTBackMatter.pdfen
dc.relation.haspartALBRIGHTBodyMatter.pdfen
dc.relation.haspartALBRIGHTFrontMatter.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectSocial Integrationen
dc.subjectAcademic Integrationen
dc.subjectGenderen
dc.subjectRaceen
dc.subjectComputer Useen
dc.titleAcademic and Social Integration by Level of Computer Use, Race, and Genderen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineEducational Leadership and Policy Studiesen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Artsen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ALBRIGHTFrontMatter.pdf
Size:
56.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ALBRIGHTBodyMatter.pdf
Size:
269.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ALBRIGHTBackMatter.pdf
Size:
220.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections