VTechWorks staff will be away for the winter holidays starting Tuesday, December 24, 2024, through Wednesday, January 1, 2025, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience, and happy holidays!
 

3-D flow and performance of a rocket pump inducer at design and off-design flow rates

TR Number

Date

1994-08-05

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Virginia Tech

Abstract

The ADP rocket pump inducer was studied computationally using a 3-D Navier-Stokes solver, The Moore Elliptic Flow Program. Design and off-design flow rates were simulated to qualitatively and quantitatively study the effects of flow rate on the flow and performance. Several views of the results were created to aid flow visualization.

The 3-D laser measurements made by Rocketdyne were used for comparison. The velocity magnitudes as well as the flow patterns within the inducer match well between the calculated and measured results. The axial velocity distribution and the rotary stagnation pressure, losses, are predicted very well by the calculation.

The internal flow patterns developed in the simulation as expected, with radial outflow in the blade boundary layers. The tip leakage flow formed a recirculation region, a toroidal shaped vortex at the tip leading edge of the blades. The associated backflow forms a blockage that varies with flow rate.

The thermodynamic performance was evaluated by calculating the contributions to pressure rise, the pump characteristic, the contributions to moment of momentum, and the efficiency. The centrifugal effect and relative velocity effect were found to vary with flow rate. The effective inlet throat radius, which governs these two effects, changes with flow rate because of the recirculation blockage. The shear on the blades was found to produce a small fraction of the work in the inducer, and most was produced by the pressure difference across the blade. The inducer efficiency was about 89%, and increased with decreasing flow rate in the range of flow rates considered, from 89% to 110% of the design flow rate.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Collections