Evaluating Liquefaction Triggering Potential from Induced Seismicity in Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas

dc.contributor.authorQuick, Tyler Jamesen
dc.contributor.committeechairGreen, Russell A.en
dc.contributor.committeechairMitchell, James K.en
dc.contributor.committeememberRathje, Ellenen
dc.contributor.committeememberRodriguez-Marek, Adrianen
dc.contributor.departmentCivil and Environmental Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-01T08:00:37Zen
dc.date.available2021-07-01T08:00:37Zen
dc.date.issued2021-06-30en
dc.description.abstractDeep wastewater injection-induced seismicity has led to over a thousand magnitude (Mw) > 3 earthquakes and four Mw>5 earthquakes in Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas (OTK) over the last ten years. Liquefaction observed following the 3 September 2016, Mw5.8 Pawnee, OK, induced earthquake raises concerns regarding the liquefaction risk posed by future induced earthquakes. The stress-based simplified liquefaction evaluation procedure is widely used to evaluate liquefaction potential. However, empirical aspects of this procedure were primarily developed for tectonic earthquakes in active shallow-crustal tectonic regimes (e.g., California). Consequently, due to differences in ground motion characteristics and regional geology, the depth-stress reduction factor (rd) and Magnitude Scaling Factor (MSF) relationships used in these variants may be unsuitable for use with induced earthquakes in OTK. This is because both rd, which accounts for the non-rigid soil profile response, and MSF, which accounts for shaking duration, are affected by ground motion and soil profile characteristics. The objective of this research is to develop and test a new liquefaction triggering model for use in assessing the regional liquefaction hazard in OTK from injection-induced earthquakes. This model incorporates induced seismicity-specific rd and MSF relationships. To assess model efficacy, the liquefaction potential is evaluated for several sites impacted by the 2016 Pawnee earthquake using the model developed herein, as well as several models commonly used to evaluate liquefaction potential for tectonic earthquakes. Estimates are then compared with field observations of liquefaction made following the Pawnee event. This analysis shows that, at most sites, the induced seismicity-specific model more accurately predicts liquefaction severity than do models developed for tectonic earthquakes, which tend to over-predict liquefaction severity. The liquefaction triggering model developed herein is also used to assess the minimum magnitude (Mmin) of induced earthquakes capable of triggering liquefaction. For sites capable of supporting structures, it is shown that Mmin = 5.0 is sufficient to fully capture liquefaction hazard from induced events in OTK. However, for extremely liquefaction-susceptible soil profiles that are potentially relevant to other infrastructure (e.g., pipelines and levees), consideration of Mmin as low as 4.0 may be required.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralSeismic activity caused by deep wastewater injection has caused over a thousand magnitude (Mw) > 3 earthquakes and four Mw>5 earthquakes in Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas (OTK) over the last ten years. These events are referred to as induced earthquakes. Liquefaction observed following the 3 September 2016, Mw5.8 Pawnee, OK, induced earthquake raises concerns regarding the liquefaction risk posed by future induced earthquakes. The stress-based simplified liquefaction evaluation procedure is widely used to evaluate liquefaction potential. However, to date, variants of this procedure were developed primarily for natural, tectonic earthquakes in active seismic areas such as California. Due to differences between induced and tectonic earthquakes as well as regional geology, existing variants of the simplified procedure may be unsuitable for use with induced earthquakes in OTK. The objective of this research is to develop and test a new liquefaction triggering model for use in assessing the regional liquefaction hazard in OTK from injection-induced earthquakes. The model was developed using regional induced earthquake ground motion recordings and soil profiles. To assess model accuracy, liquefaction potential is assessed at several sites impacted by the 2016 Pawnee earthquake using the new model, as well as several models commonly used to evaluate liquefaction potential for tectonic earthquakes. Estimates are then compared with field observations of liquefaction made following the Pawnee event. This analysis shows that, at most sites, the induced seismicity-specific model more accurately predicts liquefaction severity than do models developed for tectonic earthquakes, which tend to over-predict liquefaction severity. The liquefaction triggering model developed herein is used to assess the minimum magnitude (Mmin) of induced earthquakes capable of triggering liquefaction. For sites capable of supporting structures, it is shown that Mmin = 5.0 is sufficient to fully capture liquefaction hazard from induced events in OTK. However, for extremely liquefaction-susceptible soil profiles potentially relevant to other infrastructure (e.g., pipelines and levees), Mmin as low as 4.0 may be required.en
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:31803en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/104061en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectEarthquakesen
dc.subjectInduced Seismicityen
dc.subjectLiquefactionen
dc.subjectProbabilistic Liquefaction Hazard Analysisen
dc.titleEvaluating Liquefaction Triggering Potential from Induced Seismicity in Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansasen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineCivil Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Quick_TJ_D_2021.pdf
Size:
25.52 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Name:
Quick_TJ_D_2021_support_3.zip
Size:
39.58 MB
Format:
Description:
Supporting documents