Selection of a roof frame for a gymnasium

dc.contributor.authorGlover, Helen Forden
dc.contributor.departmentArchitectural Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-09T15:44:51Zen
dc.date.available2022-05-09T15:44:51Zen
dc.date.issued1948en
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is concerned with the choice of an appropriate roof frame for the gymnasium element of a high school designed by Joseph P. Staniunas as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Architecture. The writer is not attempting to consider every possible condition of framing which might be used in this structure. The frame spacing indicated in the original design is accepted without question, because the fifteen foot spacing given is very nearly the condition for maximum economy for conventionally loaded roof slabs of minimum depth. The framing types are limited to the two-hinged and the three-hinged forms as indicated in the original design. Only two materials, structural steel and reinforced concrete, are considered, although it is recognized that laminated wood might also be suitable. In his thesis, Mr. Staniunas expresses a preference for laminated wood arches to span the gymnasium. He feels that "laminated wood arches give a cleaner appearance to the interior." This writer believes his objective may be equally well obtained in steel or concrete. Therefore, the frames will be designed on this basis, selecting from the four, the best from the standpoints of structure, aesthetics, and economy. The computations occupy approximately 200 pages. It is not felt that this material could be successfully compressed for inclusion in this presentation. Instead, the entire body of computations is reproduced on microfilm and the film is on file at the main college library. The writer feels that the three-hinged steel frame is the most desirable of the four for the following reasons, in order of importance: (a) In appearance it is the lightest and airiest of the four frames examined and accords well with the general character of Mr. Staniunas' design. (b) It is one of the least costly of the four frames. (c) It is readily erected with light equipment Which would be an advantage in Blacksburg, where heavy equipment is not easily available.en
dc.description.degreeM.S.en
dc.format.extent[5], 15 leaves, 165 unnumbered leaves in various pagingsen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/109844en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Polytechnic Instituteen
dc.relation.haspartCalculations for selection of a roof frame for a gymnasium. Gift of John F. Poulton.en
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 38200509en
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 20223389en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V855 1948.G58en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V855 1948.G58 Calculationsen
dc.subject.lcshGymnasiumsen
dc.subject.lcshRoofsen
dc.titleSelection of a roof frame for a gymnasiumen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineArchitectural Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Instituteen
thesis.degree.levelmastersen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V855_1948.G58.pdf
Size:
4.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V855_1948.G58_Calculations.pdf
Size:
162.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections