Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • ETDs: Virginia Tech Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Masters Theses
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • ETDs: Virginia Tech Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Masters Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effect of processing parameters on the detection of animal drug residues in milk

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    LD5655.V855_1992.C667.pdf (3.503Mb)
    Downloads: 135
    Date
    1992-08-05
    Author
    Conner, Tonya Michele
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The advent of new methods to detect animal drug residues has resulted in a need to independently validate them. The effects of processing milk on the performance of these methods was evaluated. Antibiotic-free milk samples were spiked with sulfamethazine, penicillin G, and chlortetracycline at levels of 10, 10 and 30 ppb, respectively. Spiked milk and negative control milk was heat-treated, homogenized or heat-treated and homogenized. The procedures evaluated for penicillin detection were Bacillus stearothermophilus disk assay, a HPLC described by Barker et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, and CITE Probe and LacTek enzyme immunoassays. The procedures evaluated for sulfonamide detection were an HPLC method described by Long et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, CITE Probe, LacTek and Signal enzyme immunoassays. The methods evaluated for tetracycline detection were a HPLC method described by Long et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, and LacTek and CITE Probe enzyme immunoassays. The results indicate that the commercial tests and the disk assay were not adversely affected by processing treatments. Significant treatment differences were found when testing raw Charm II data by analysis of variance but these differences did not effect the overall results of the test. Results of the HPLC method were inconclusive for the three drugs tested.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41720
    Collections
    • Masters Theses [22220]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us