Abrasive Blasting with Post-Process and In-Situ Characterization
Mills, Robert Jeffrey
MetadataShow full item record
Abrasive blasting is a common process for cleaning or roughening the surface of a material prior to the application of a coating. Although the process has been in practice for over 100 years, the lack of a comprehensive understanding of the complex interactions that exist with the process can still yield an inferior surface quality. Subsequently, parts can be rejected at one of many stages of the manufacturing process and/or fail unexpectedly upon deployment. The objective of this work is to evaluate the effect of selected input parameters on the characteristics of the blasted surface characteristics so that a more useful control strategy can be implemented. To characterize surface roughness, mechanical profilometry was used to collect average roughness parameter, Ra. Decreasing blast distance from 6' to 4' gave �"Ra = +0.22 �[BULLET]m and from 8' to 6' gave �"Ra = +0.22 �[BULLET]m. Increasing blast pressure from 42 psi to 60 psi decreased the Ra by 0.33 �[BULLET]m. Media pulsation reduced Ra by 0.56 �[BULLET]m and the use of new media reduced Ra by 0.47 �[BULLET]m. Although blasting under the same conditions and operator on different days led to �"Ra due to shorter blast times, there was no statistically significant variance in Ra attributed to blasting on different days. Conversely, a �"Ra = +0.46 �[BULLET]m was observed upon blasting samples with different cabinets. No significant �"Ra was found when switching between straight and Venturi nozzles or when using different operators. Furthermore, the feasibility of fiber optic sensing technologies was investigated as potential tools to provide real time feedback to the blast machine operator in terms of substrate temperature. Decreasing the blast distance from 6' to 4' led to �"T = +9.2 �[BULLET]C, while decreasing the blast angle to 45�[BULLET] gave �"T= -11.6 �[BULLET]C for 304 stainless steel substrates. Furthermore, increasing the blast pressure from 40 psi to 50 psi gave �"T= +15.3 �[BULLET]C and changing from 50 psi to 60 psi gave �"T= +9.9 �[BULLET]C. The blast distance change from 8' to 6' resulted in �"T = +9.8 �[BULLET]C in thin stainless steel substrate temperature. The effects of substrate thickness or shape were evaluated, giving �"T= +7.4 �[BULLET]C at 8' distance, �"T= +20.2 �[BULLET]C at 60 psi pressure, and �"T= -15.2 �[BULLET]C at 45�[BULLET] blasting when comparing thin stainless steel against 304 stainless steel (thick) temperatures. No significant �"T in means was found when going from 6' to 8' distance on 304 stainless steel, 40 psi and 60 psi blasting of thin SS, as well as angled and perpendicular blasting of thin SS. Comparing thick 304 and thin stainless steel substrates at a 6' blast distance gave no significant �"T.
- Masters Theses